Those were good times when the annual gathering of politicians in Davos was undisturbed by dissonant tones. It was important to be invited, seen and listened to the latest guidelines on how to behave in the future. No one thought of challenging the basic principles of global capitalism. Everyone knew what they had to do after returning to their provinces. Also, no one asked questions about who the real organizers of these gatherings were and why the owners of the largest banks did not appear in person to convey their wishes to the world. It seems that the most powerful people in the Western world do not want or do not find it necessary to address such an important gathering. If they did, then they would have to answer unpleasant questions from the past and present that plague the economies of the Western world. It is much more comfortable for them to monitor everything from afar as if they had no responsibility for the problems of the Western economy and society. The new American administration, however, had had enough and began to ask unpleasant questions and offer, for the globalists, unpleasant solutions. For bankers and big capitalists, this is a problem because in this case it is about the strongest liberal-capitalist stronghold (the USA) that cannot be ignored or censored.
***
“The infamous wall that divided this (German) nation in two during the Cold War has fallen, and with it the evil empire, and East and West have become one again. The euphoria of this triumph has led us to a dangerous delusion: that we have entered, I quote, the ‘end of history’; that every nation will now be a liberal democracy; that ties forged by trade and trade alone will now replace nationality; that a rules-based global order – an all-too-often used phrase – will now replace national interest, and that we will now live in a world without borders where everyone becomes a citizen of the world.”
(US Secretary of State Mark Rubio at the Munich Security Conference on February 26, 2026)
***
There are many examples that show the incomprehensible arrogance of American liberals, and for this occasion it is appropriate to mention the behavior of the US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright from the Clinton administration. This lady, immediately after getting off the plane, when she came to visit China (1998), began to give lessons on human rights to Chinese politicians representing an ancient nation of more than a billion people.
***
(The quotes below are excerpts from US President Trump’s speech at Davos 2026.)
“We stopped the decline in jobs and exports. During the Biden administration, the price of oil rose dramatically. They were forcefully closing down power plants, incompetent people who didn’t know what they were doing.”
“I approved new nuclear reactors. I wasn’t a big fan of nuclear energy, but given the progress, we’re re-entering the world of nuclear energy.”
“We have oil plants, coal plants. We have avoided a catastrophic energy collapse, unlike European countries that followed the big green scam, the biggest scam. In Europe, the radical left tried to impose it on the US. Germany produces less electricity, but that is not the chancellor’s fault, it is his legacy. Electricity prices are 64 percent higher. Great Britain only produces a quarter of what it used to produce. Their energy is at a catastrophic level, and they are next to the North the sea. Environmentalists do not allow them to drill there, they deny them income.”
***
It’s not too late for Trump to retract his statements about a green future. He still doesn’t know that we in Croatia take decarbonization very seriously and that for this purpose we have formed a special Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition and completely removed factory chimneys. And media and political manipulation has brought people to their peak. In this country, everyone would like to live in sterile, clean nature and at the same time enjoy a high material standard. Well, that won’t work and it should be labeled as the most ordinary nonsense without reservation.
Trump would benefit from a conversation with the energetic woman who heads that ministry and he would immediately realize that he is on the wrong path. He would also learn that in Croatia it is customary for women who perform in public to have one or both eyes covered by their hair.
***
“I want Europe to be prosperous, and so is Great Britain. They have one of the biggest energy sources in the world (the North Sea), but they are not using it. Prices have risen by 193%.”
“China makes wind farms and sells them to stupid people. They don’t use them, it serves as an example. China uses coal, oil, gas. Now they’ve started to focus on nuclear energy. They’re doing well, they’re doing very well. They’re making a fortune selling wind farms, turbines. It’s stupid, stupid people who buy it.”
***
The Green Front from Croatia stands firmly by the windmills in defense against the gust of unpleasant and unforeseen wind from the west. The people implementing the large windmill project are not ordinary wind chasers, as Trump would think, but very skillful entrepreneurs when it comes to quick profits in the mega-project of green transition. These entrepreneurs do not bother much with the questions of whether the green economy is sustainable and how much the people will pay for the green fog.
Such “uncouth” behavior of the American president must be deeply offensive to the ears of the powerful who until yesterday were absolute masters in the West and who have begun to impose liberal ideology on other nations. Trump was sent messages in his first term in the form of constant scandals, and during the election campaign in a more serious way, to be “reasonable” and not question the supremacy of capitalists. But it seems that this is the type of politician who shows no fear of suffering the fate of the Kennedy brothers. What’s worse for the liberals is that the leaders he has surrounded himself with are younger and even more energetic people.
***
(The quotes below are excerpts from a speech by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference in 2026.)
“We have increasingly surrendered our sovereignty to international institutions, while many countries have invested heavily in building a welfare state at the expense of their defense capabilities. This has happened even as other countries have invested in the fastest military buildup in human history and have not hesitated to use brute force to advance their own interests. To appease the climate cult, we have imposed energy policies that impoverish our people, even as our competitors exploit oil, coal, natural gas, and everything else—not just to fuel their economies, but to use them as leverage against ours.”
“By embracing the politics of a borderless world, we have opened our doors to an unprecedented wave of mass migration that threatens the cohesion of our society, the continuity of our culture, and the future of our people. We made these mistakes together, and now, together, we owe it to our people to face these facts and move forward in rebuilding.”
“Under President Trump, the United States of America will once again take up the task of rebuilding, guided by a vision of a future as proud, as sovereign, and as vital as our civilization’s past. While we are prepared, if necessary, to do it alone, it is our preference and hope to do it together with you, our friends here in Europe.”
“National security, which is largely discussed at this conference, is not just a series of technical questions – where and how much we spend on defense and how we allocate it, these are important questions, but they are not fundamental. The fundamental question that we must answer at the outset is what exactly we are defending, because armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people; armies fight for a state. Armies fight for a way of life. That is what we are defending: our great civilization, which has every reason to be proud of its history, confident in its future and always striving to be the master of its own economic and political destiny.”
***
All those who have advocated for the construction of a multi-racial and multi-cultural society should reflect on the above-mentioned claims. A multi-ethnic army can act in combat if it is united by the same worldview. We can take the example of the Red Army in the USSR, where a common faith in a communist society was an integrative factor. But if different racial elements, in an army, have different values and interests, then such an organization becomes inferior in a clash with an opponent who is ethnically homogeneous. Only mechanical affirmation of the principles of professionalism and general soldierly virtues will help little here.
***
“Deindustrialization was not inevitable. It was a conscious political choice, a decades-long economic enterprise that stripped our nations of wealth, productive capacity, and independence. The loss of sovereignty over our supply chains was not a consequence of a prosperous and healthy system of global trade. It was stupid. It was a foolish but voluntary transformation of our economy that left us dependent on others for our needs and dangerously vulnerable to crises.”
“We must also take control of our national borders. Controlling who and how many people enter our countries is not an expression of xenophobia. It is not hatred. It is a fundamental act of national sovereignty. And failing to do so is not just abdicating one of our most basic duties to our people. It is a serious threat to the fabric of our societies and the very survival of our civilization.”
“Finally, we can no longer put the so-called global order above the vital interests of our people and our nations. We must not abandon the system of international cooperation that we have created, and we must not dismantle the global institutions of the old order that we have built together. They must be reformed. They must be renewed.”
“For five centuries, before the end of World War II, the West had been expanding. Its missionaries, pilgrims, soldiers, explorers poured from its shores to cross oceans, to settle new continents, to build vast empires that stretched across the globe.”
“Since 1945, for the first time since Columbus, Europe has been shrinking, lying in ruins. Half of it lived behind the Iron Curtain, and the rest seemed destined to end up the same way. The great Western empires have entered a terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and anti-colonial uprisings that will transform the world and place the red hammer and sickle over vast swaths of the map in the years to come.”
“That is why we do not want our allies to be weak because that makes us weaker. We want allies who can defend themselves so that no adversary will ever be tempted to test our collective strength. That is why we do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization and who, together with us, are willing and able to defend it.”
“That is why we do not want allies to dwell on how the status quo is broken rather than confront what needs to be done to fix it. For we in America have no interest in being polite and caring stewards of the managed decline of the West. We do not want to separate, but to revitalize an old friendship and rebuild the greatest civilization in human history. What we want is a revitalized alliance that recognizes that what has plagued our societies is not just a collection of bad policies, but a malaise of hopelessness and complacency. The alliance we want is one that is not paralyzed by fear of climate change, fear of war, and fear of technology. Instead, we want an alliance that steps boldly into the future. The only fear we need to have is the fear of shame that we will not leave our nations prouder, stronger, and richer to our children.”
“An alliance ready to defend our people, protect our interests, and preserve the freedom of action that allows us to shape our own destiny – not one that exists to run a global welfare state and atone for the supposed sins of past generations. An alliance that does not allow its power to be ceded, limited, or subordinated to systems beyond its control; one that does not depend on others for the critical needs of its national life; and one that does not maintain the polite pretense that our way of life is just one among many and that asks permission before it acts.”
***
When we read the above excerpts from the two speeches, one gets the impression that voices that were long silenced and pushed into semi-illegality after World War II have been resurrected. The owners of CNN immediately recognized the voices from the past and rightly indicated through their journalist that Marco Rubio’s speech was “a destructive force wrapped in chocolate and warm emotions”. Seen from the perspective of their interests, this is a concise and correct assessment. Since interests in human society are different, it should be added that the American minister tried to save the interests of European peoples on both continents, which have become seriously endangered. Without unnecessary moralizing, the real question is: why would the Trump government’s program be destructive for the interests of media owners in Europe and the USA and whose interests they represent? Why do big capitalists feel comfortable only when the racial and cultural cohesion of European peoples is diluted?
Trump has not only upset the media, but also the owners of banks. Many have missed that the new/old president came into conflict with the FED (Federal Reserve) immediately after taking power. It should be noted that Americans do not have a central bank, but rather a group of 12 private banks, whose owners believe that they know better than the elected president what should be done and what should not be done. The thing is that these owners never go to the elections, but they think that the elected president of the country should not interfere in how the monetary and credit policy should be conducted. How nice! Let’s just remember how ineffective the FED was at a time when speculative capitalism at the beginning of the century brought the American and Western economies to the brink of collapse.
The new winds from the West are not a revolution, it is a rebellion of limited proportions within the existing system. There are many indicators that confirm the above thesis. It seems that it is easier for the US president to intervene militarily in other countries than politically in his own. For example, he cannot remove the chairman of the FED, but the Supreme Court can revoke his tariff policy. It should be added that Trump does not have the support of media owners or the entertainment industry. These same owners had so much power that they blocked the president’s social networks in his first term. They still feel so powerful that they completely block public discussion of the principles of international capitalism, such as the organized replacement of European populations and the anthropogenic nature of climate change. Because any public discussion on this topic today would completely expose the power centers behind the aforementioned harmful projects.
The rebels simply see that they have been brought to the edge of the abyss and no longer want to step forward with their heads held high.