GENERAL CONFUSION IN THE EUROPEAN CITY OF M.
In February 2025, the city of M. was a gathering place for the ruling elite from other European cities. Since no dissenters were invited to the conference, a sense of self-satisfaction and pride in their social achievements prevailed among the guests. Anyone from the world could illegally come to the city and get accommodation at the city’s expense, and the promotion of homosexuality and the green transition became the benchmark for fulfilling European values and a way of life. And any politician who questioned the aforementioned great values would immediately be labeled an extremist who disrupts social harmony. This idyll was suddenly disrupted by a lone rider who appeared in the city. He was beard and wicked gaze from under his lowered eyebrows immediately caused concern among the politically correct dignitaries of the city and guests. He introduced himself as the envoy of the new sheriff in the city of W. It should be emphasized that the leaders of the European cities have already acquired the political reflex to listen carefully and accept as a guide the opinion of every sheriff from the city of W. since the end of the Second World War. That is why this time the city elite gathered in the expectation that the meeting would pass in agreement on common values. It immediately became clear that the stranger was as skilled with language as with a revolver. Without any respect for the politically correct leaders, he questioned their favorite values. He pointed out the political chaos that the city elite had created when they invited immigrants to enter the city illegally. Without any respect for the political values of the city elite, he said that their main problem was uncontrolled immigration into the city at the city’s expense, not protecting the borders of cities far to the east.
J. D. Vance1
The politically correct were appalled by this behavior. They began to quietly exchange comments with each other: “How dare he question our political values when everything is so clear. This man clearly hasn’t watched TV long enough, probably hasn’t been “educated” enough by NGOs, an hillbilly and a provincial. Does he even believe what he’s saying?” And some immediately thought that the tried-and-true solutions for dissenters should be applied to him: a ban on access to the media and psychotherapy to help him deal with his inner problems. The Lone Rider would really have received such treatment if he weren’t the representative of the great new sheriff.
The long-standing practice of the ruling elites has shown the effectiveness of using concepts from psychiatry. When it comes to the physical shortcomings of the opponent, then there is a narrow space for manipulation. Thus, it is not possible to label a political opponent as blind, if he is not, and the question is how successfully it would be to invent and emphasize that. But the field of psychiatry has proven suitable for this form of dealing with a political opponent. For example, the opponent becomes a hater of everything and everyone, an extremist, so let him defend himself later in conditions when he does not have access to the media. When it comes to psychiatric concepts in political struggle, then it should be emphasized that there is a part of that pathological spectrum that the ruling liberal elites never use. We will never hear of a political opponent being labeled with the inscription: unnatural sexual behavior, perversion or masochism (individual and collective).
Some city leaders have found the strength to openly object to the behavior of one of the deputy sheriffs from the city of W. in the west. This extremely wealthy deputy E. M. behaves in a completely unconventional manner, and the hosts have noticed that he reminds them more of a young Mick Jagger on stage than a government official. In addition, there are politically incorrect statements. Members of the city’s elite expected the guest to try to defend himself after these remarks, but he became extremely sarcastic when he retorted rhetorically: “If we in America could listen to Greta Thunberg’s lessons for ten years, then you can listen to and watch E. M. for a few months.”
Translated into plain language, this means: “When we have been forced to listen to Greta Thunberg’s nonsense about the green transition and man-made climate change for years, then you can watch our new eccentric official for a few months.” In reality, the new sheriff withdrew from the international climate change agreement immediately after taking office. In his opinion, the provisions of that agreement have already caused great damage to his city’s economy. To the general dismay of the European political elite, he has stopped believing in the fundamental dogma of the anthropogenic cause of climate change, and is now trying to impose his heresy on us in Europe, unheard of.
The head of the largest economy in the West has expressed similar views before, as have the leaders of large economies from other continents, but this has not swayed European city authorities in the slightest from abandoning their blind pursuit to their own detriment. The followers of the new climate cult were still convinced that they were doing a good job. Their faith could not be shaken even by the European car industry’s stumble under the cross of Brussels’ regulations on abandoning fossil fuels in the economy and switching to electric vehicles and the increase in the price of all life, because we can lose the industry, but we must not lose the planet.
The psychological state of the European elite in the city of M. is perhaps best illustrated by the fact that the chairman of the meeting was so shaken by the appearance of the American cowboy that he stopped laughing at the new sheriff and burst into tears. It was truly touching to watch him being consoled by his like-minded people.
Among the first to come up and wipe away the tears was a representative of a small town on the Adriatic coast, known for taking the depth of Ms. Thunberg’s thoughts seriously. In that country, believers have been repeating the same words of evening prayer mechanically for centuries. Now, when every household has its own TV altar in the house, TV owners have made sure that the old rituals are replaced by new ones. Now, reminders and intimidation have become an integral part of the evening ritual. The thesis is always the same, man has committed a grave sin against nature and the only way to atone for it is to sacrifice all the short-term benefits associated with the production of carbon dioxide. He briefly presented the weeping politician with all the successes his small country has achieved in saving planet Earth. He stated that all carbon dioxide producers are legally forced to pay a special tax that would then be directed towards green transition projects and sustainable economies. He also boasted that his country has shut down or demolished all chimneys, as well as that it has almost liquidated the evil methane producers on farms. Hearing such expressions of faith and support, the shaken politician’s face lit up. He instinctively hugged the orthodox southerner, whispering: “Our faith in decarbonization and a multicultural society will save us, and the producers of toxic fossil fuels will be left without a fundamental lever of power.”
Other leaders of the city elite, one after another, continued to console and reassure the weeping man that the new sheriff in the city of W. was only a passing phenomenon, something like a modern Julian the Apostate,2 and that after his short political diversion, the golden age of free movement of people, goods, and capital would once again begin in the city of W. We know from history that the gods were not on the side of the ancient Apostate, that he ruled for a short time and died a violent death. The modern political Apostate happily survived the attempts on violent death, but it is unlikely that the modern gods/powerful ones will tolerate such a tyrant for long, who attacks immortal planetary green values. These values are so clear to the ruling elite in the West that they have decided that there should be no public debate about them, because it can only confuse politicians and the faithful people.
After a short speech, there were many questions, but the lone rider showed no desire for discussion, explaining that he had already planned a tour of the historical sights of the city of M with his wife. Who knows, maybe soon the cult of the green goddess Thunberg will flourish again in the large western city of W. In that case, the green goddess will be resurrected in all her beauty like the deities of ancient Egypt, and her great enemy Carbon Dioxide (CO2), as the embodiment of evil, will be driven underground with other evil spirits/gases. In the general joy, no one will ask themselves how someone could think of declaring this life-giving gas a pollutant?
It should be immediately recalled that in this case, angry reactions will follow from the deities from the group called the Solar planetary system.
The Sun, Sol invictus,3 as the most powerful, will object: “What audacity to claim that climate changes occur on our companion planet against our will! How can some microorganisms on Earth (Gaia) cause such changes? Other members of the Solar pantheon will think similarly. Among them, Jupiter will certainly be the most indignant. Jupiter has always been aware of his power in relation to the other deities held captive by the mighty Sun. Jupiter will certainly wonder: “How someone can change the climate on the small planet Earth without his will when it is known that it, like the other planets, adjusts its movement according to our will.”
Regardless of the contrary opinion of the most powerful gods in the Solar system, in this gigantic battle between good and evil, the small country on the Adriatic Sea has clearly made its choice. Nothing smokes in it anymore, and the evil spirits led by CO2 have been expelled.
- https://www.advance.hr/tekst/jd-vance-u-m-nchenu-kompletan-transkript-govor-koji-je-smrznuo-atlantik-i-duboko-sokirao-europu/ [↩]
- Julian II the Apostate (331–363), Roman emperor and philosopher, known for attempting to revive the cult of the Roman gods in opposition to the spread of Christianity. [↩]
- Invincible Sun, Roman name for a deity. [↩]
No Comment! Be the first one.